Point-in-Time
Only information that was actually observable before the decision point is allowed into a feature.
We do not design tests to make a hypothesis easy to confirm. We design them so that a false conclusion is difficult to survive.
Only information that was actually observable before the decision point is allowed into a feature.
Instead of tuning rules after seeing past results, we define a new prospective start and evaluate only data collected afterward.
We design placebo, reverse-direction, and timing tests specifically to find ways the hypothesis could fail.
When a data-integrity incident occurs, we quarantine the affected records rather than deleting them, preserving the original provenance.
Effect metrics remain blinded until the sample reaches maturity, reducing the temptation to tune the study after seeing the result.
Even strong research results never change execution settings automatically.
An old event timestamp does not prove that the feature was available at decision time. We track first-seen availability from the consuming system's perspective.
Where possible, decisions, references, features, and endpoint identities are linked end to end. Any upstream lineage that cannot be reconstructed remains explicitly UNKNOWN.
A backup is not trusted simply because the file exists. We restore it into a separate namespace and verify row counts and schema.
Hypotheses, failures, reasons for changes, and evidence locations are recorded in a separate journal and preserved in checksummed off-host backups.
Unknown is not a PASS. Anything that cannot be verified remains explicitly unknown, and historical invalid or pilot arms are never merged into a new confirmatory arm.